|
How Competitive
Intelligence Helps Businesses to Read Between the
Lines by Edwin Bailey, managing director of
Piribo.com and ReportBuyer.com, online business
intelligence for industry
One of the reasons why the executives of U.S. energy group
Enron were regarded as “The Smartest Guys in the Room” was because
they were able to manipulate their accounting to keep the
share price inflated. They created a raft of special
purpose vehicles (SPVs) and, by carefully staying within
statutory ownership percentage levels, did not have to declare
them in their consolidated accounts. Only when they
slipped up on one of them did the whole network start to
unravel.
In his new book, Competitive Intelligence,
Christopher Murphy points out how such “off balance sheet”
finance was an element in many corporate debacles, and he
provides a guide to unpicking an annual report. It shows
how to read between the lines of the facts and figures in the
balance sheet, the profit and loss account, and—perhaps most
important of all—the cash flow statement.
This book explains the technical mechanisms that some
companies offer in their accounts and which professional
analysts use and provides advice on how to assess what the
figures tell about where a business and might be going.
Corporate crime writer Michael Ridpath explains in the
book’s introduction that: “In business you cannot
operate effectively unless you know what everyone else is
doing.” Competitive Intelligence
demonstrates that it isn’t just a matter of facts and figures,
but the strategy and motivations of your competitors, as well
as your customers, that matter. You have to look at all the
factors that make a market what it is today, and the factors
that will indicate how it is likely to develop in the future.
Sleeper or warrior?
The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most competitive
industries there is with the Holy Grail being either to find
the next successful compound or licence in a winner. As a
result, the entire industry is scouring universities,
journals, and partnering conferences for information that will
lead to a lucky find.
What structures does the industry put in place to acquire
the information needed to stay one step ahead of its rivals?
With so much information being collected, much of it will
never be used effectively, so Murphy recommends a corporate
system for collating, analysing and channelling
intelligence. Even more crucial, a board member needs to
champion the process and convert the intelligence into
strategic decisions.
Murphy cites a survey carried out in the UK in 2002 that
painted an interesting picture of how competitive intelligence
(CI) is viewed and used. It found that most pharma companies
thought CI was simply about investigating competitors. Only
five took the wider perspective of using it to understand
their market environment, and only three adopted an integrated
approach.
Another survey of U.S. and French pharma companies
categorised the different company approaches as
- Sleeper
- Reactive
- Active
- Assault and Warrior
Hoffman LaRoche and L’Oreal were put in the Assault and
Warrior category because they had dedicated war rooms,
actively checked patents, and used a dragnet to trawl the
world for copycat products.
What are we looking for?
But does competitor activity end there? Murphy proposes
companies adopt Competitive Intelligence as a distinct
business function, ideally with a head of department at board
level. To organise the CI function the following Key
Intelligence Topics, or KITS, are useful. These fall
into three broad groups:
Strategic Decisions – These should be
based on a knowledge of the competitive environment. To
embark on an acquisition is obviously a key decision and the
book covers this in detail.
Early Warning Topics – These issues are
not normally included in management’s assessment of their
competitive situation. An example would be a threat to the
supply chain of essential materials resulting from either a
political situation or the acquisition of suppliers by a
rival.
Descriptions of Key Players – The
traditional use of Competitive Intelligence.
Counterintelligence – The tables can
always be turned! An entire chapter of the book is devoted to
creating your own protective shield. On the principle of
“get a thief to catch a thief,” a trained CI specialist is the
ideal person to provide good advice here.
Before adopting CI as a business function, executives
should educate themselves in the discipline. Murphy
emphasises that “many senior executives regard CI as a comfort
blanket rather than a guide to better decision making.
These will tend to ask for a great deal of information, which
gives them reassurance that they are alert and well briefed,
but has little influence on their actions.” There have
to be objectives, a plan and a framework—and a useable outcome
in the form of a report containing succinctly analysed
information that can be used to influence actions.
Knowing When to Stop
One of Murphy’s caveats in Computer Intelligence
is that companies must know when to stop the search. Medical
research offers some useful lessons that can also be used in
CI:
- Theories are crucially important in providing
platforms to support the superstructure of research.
Even erroneous hypotheses serve as tools for discovering the
truth;
- Research efforts are concentrated on the most
promising lines of enquiry and not dissipated in ‘let’s see
what happens’ initiatives;
- Projects not making headway are ruthlessly
dropped. Emotional attachment to a pet project can
result in analysis paralysis.
Knowing where to
look
Murphy warns that it is important not to rush at data
collection but to work out the best sources in advance. He
quotes fellow author Liam Fahey as saying that “80 percent of
the data needed for effective study of competitors who have
been active in the market for two to three years is available
in-house.”
So where to start? Try trade associations, official
statistics, individual company websites, market research,
brokers’ research, monographs (reports, books), journals, or
regulatory authorities. The British library [www.bl.uk] is an
excellent source for published information on British
companies. It also compiles a dossier of what is termed grey
literature, or non-documented reports on individual companies
(visit www.bl.uk/services/document/greylit.html).
Intelligence gathering on companies in other parts of the
EU is a lot harder. In Germany, for instance, there is a
legal requirement for public companies to file their accounts,
but the bulk of companies fall into the Mittelsland
of family-owned, private concerns. They are able to side step
the requirement by paying a modest fine. The net result
of this is that only 5% of these companies file accounts.
In Europe there is the added problem of multiple
registries. There’s nothing neat like the UK’s Companies
House, where all companies can report. For smaller
companies there are local registries, some 500 in Germany and
100 in France. Also there are still different national
accounting traditions within the EU. Local researchers are
indispensable in this sort of corporate minefield.
In the United States the Securities & Exchange
Commission (SEC) regulates public companies and those with
assets over $10 million or over 500 employees. The SEC
provides a wealth of information including EDGAR, a database
of company documentation. (Pricewaterhouse Coopers
[www.pwc.com] has a useful tool for CI researchers called
Edgarscan.) Private companies are more difficult to pin
down so a little lateral thinking may be required. All
applications for new build, or licences for manufacturing
plant, are registered, and there is a useful publication
called the Sourcebook of State Public Records that
provides information on where to find all these
documents. For the pharma industry, the University of Washington’s Researchers’ !
Guide gives more data on private companies than you would
be able to pick up from Dun & Bradstreet.
Simple observation
Companies do, of course, disseminate information on
themselves quite willingly as they know that publicity is
vital to attract business partners or customers. Web sites and
press releases therefore reveal quite a lot.
Trade shows, including partnering and venture capital
conferences, bring many business targets together. However
Murphy makes the point that going to trade shows should be a
structured activity aimed at filling in the gaps in existing
knowledge. Wandering about on the off chance of spotting
something interesting is not productive, although listening to
other people’s unguarded conversations in the hospitality
suite is apparently acceptable CI practice.
Putting CI to practical use
The CI practitioner has to turn all the gathered
information into a report that a senior executive can use in
decision-making, and Murphy’s book illustrates the various
tools of analysis that can be applied in order to draw useful
conclusions.
Murphy also warns that if one company can get its act
together on the competitive intelligence front, so can its
rivals. The book concludes with a guide to
counterespionage, which shows how a company can build its own
protective shield to ensure that information isn’t leaking
out.
While Murphy doesn’t believe it benefits a company to be
secretive, especially in these days of transparency, he
recommends a company should take sensible steps to safeguard
its intellectual property. And who better to advise on
that than those bright boys and girls from Competitive
Intelligence?
Competitive Intelligence: Gathering, Analysing and
Putting it to Work by Christopher Murphy is
available from online pharma business bookshop, Piribo Ltd [www.piribo.com]
Competitors: Outwitting, Outmaneuvering and
Outperforming by Liam Fahey. Published by John
Wiley & Sons Ltd The Society for Competitive
Intelligence Professionals (SCIP) [http://www.scip.org]
Edwin Bailey is managing director of Pirbo Ltd (owners of
Piribo.com and ReportBuyer.com) For more information
telephone + 44 207 060 7474
This is an extract from an article which first appeared
May 2006 in PharmaFocus. |